What an utter piece of shit.

  • @fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    261 year ago

    Treason is very narrowly defined in US law. The US is not at war with Russia, and the US is not Ukraine, so no, it’s not.

      • Again. The US government is not the Ukrainian government.

        The most painful thing the government could do would be to sanction Musk and his companies for taking actions counter to US foreign policy prerogatives, but then Musk would just pull the plug on Starlink altogether. So nothing will be done.

        • @meco03211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Seeing as musk could unilaterally act in a fashion contrary to US foreign policy, in the interest of national security the government should take control of the company then.

          Obviously that would be an extreme step but… how bad would that get?

          • @orclev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            That’s basically a variant of eminent domain, but I suspect it would be a hard case to argue. Ukraine chose to use Starlink, and the US governments power to invoke eminent domain is based on the common good provided to the US public via the seized property. It’s arguable whether the US public would see much if any value from the US government running Starlink unless they’re going to start providing free service to US citizens. There’s also the problem that there are plenty of other options that don’t require seizing of property.

            • @jonne@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              51 year ago

              The US could just nationalise it. SpaceX is basically running on government money anyway, just fold it into NASA.

              • @jarfil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                NASA is basically being forced by Congress to funnel SLS program money into select contractors against NASA’s own assessments. I don’t think you want any of their hands near SpaceX if you want it to stay operational.

        • WuTang
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -8
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          as EU members but somehow, they decided to mess with Russia and we, EU citizen, were taken in this sh*.

          • @jarfil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            As an EU citizen, I fully support EU’s “messing” with Russia to support Ukraine, and I thank our NATO allies for keeping us “in this sh*”.

            • WuTang
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -31 year ago

              HAHA, nobody would say that, NO ONE except maybe if you have a relative in UA, still…

              It’s easy to argue on internet but IRL, this pseudo unconditional support does not exist.

      • @HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Nope, he wasn’t trying to overthrow the government of country he is a citizen of. He could be considered a non state actor though.

          • @HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            The Ukrainians can certainly call him that.

            Notable examples of Non State Actors are: Blackwater(American security company) Wagner (Russian).

          • @jarfil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Weird “enemy” who’s actively supporting 99% of one’s war efforts.

            By that rule of thumb, would the US be an “enemy” for being reluctant to supply latest gen weaponry to Ukraine?

              • @jarfil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                01 year ago

                How is the difference between “supporting in almost everything” vs. “attacking”, a pedantic one?

                • @TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  Hold on. I’m not criticizing. I’m just curious. I’ve done it myself. I’m just curious about what leads us to be this way. Is it the need for details and facts, or does it concern communication in social media spaces?

                  • @jarfil@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    21 year ago

                    Hm? If you mean why do we participate in discussions, personally my main goal is to learn (unless I get triggered by some stupidity… but I’m trying not to). Looking for details is an effective way to find differences between points of view, which means reviewing one’s own, and comparing them to someone else’s. Sometimes I can learn about myself, sometimes about someone else, sometimes about an actual fact. Either is fine by me. [disassembly reveals useful pathways…]

                    There are other uses for social media, other ways of communication. I’m not a fan of witch hunting though, or mob mentality, so that leaves either education, emotional support, or just goofing off.

                    This post in particular, I think only works for discussions or witch hunting, and I refuse to take part in the latter, so… 🤷