RmDebArc_5 to Firefox@lemmy.ml • 2 days ago#Firefox doesn't need any new features to be more attractive for users, it just needs to make CSS theming more accessibles3.toot.ioimagemessage-square71fedilinkarrow-up1319arrow-down138file-text
arrow-up1281arrow-down1image#Firefox doesn't need any new features to be more attractive for users, it just needs to make CSS theming more accessibles3.toot.ioRmDebArc_5 to Firefox@lemmy.ml • 2 days agomessage-square71fedilinkfile-text
#Firefox doesn’t need any new features to be more attractive for users, it just needs to make CSS theming more accessible Theme: https://github.com/Godiesc/firefox-one #FirefoxCSS #browserwar #customization @firefox
minus-square@Quail4789@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish1•16 hours agoIts like userchrome but for the contents of the webpage. You match on the url and write css that overrides the site’s css.
minus-square@unrushed233link1•8 hours agoSo basically like a user style that you would use in Stylus? What are the differences, advantages/disadvantages?
Its like userchrome but for the contents of the webpage. You match on the url and write css that overrides the site’s css.
So basically like a user style that you would use in Stylus? What are the differences, advantages/disadvantages?
my dude, this isn’t google